SIGIA-L Mail Archives: Re: [Sigia-l] What happened to the good IAs
Re: [Sigia-l] What happened to the good IAs
On 6/21/07, Laurie Gray <laurie.gray_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> OK so to play devil's advocate, what about a BOK (Body of Knowledge) such as
> those that are being developed for the BA profession and have been developed
> for the PM profession?
> Laurie
Hi Laurie,
On this aside: I believe that BABOK will have a long hard road because
of the diversity of the audience - the financial business analysts do
not have a history of agreeing to the same success criteria as the
technical BAs, who have a history of methodological holy wars within
themselves. I do have to admit that I'm no expert on this - just what
I pick up talking to people who are interested in some form of BA
certification.
And if I could counter-devil, because if there was a IABOK it would be
a good thing: can you name a single thing that everyone on this list
could agree should go into the IABOK? Can anyone else? Can we agree on
a common point that is specific enough to be useful, yet widely
acceptable?
Cheers, Andrew
---
Andrew Boyd
http://facibusreviews.com
------------
IA Summit 2008: "Experiencing Information"
April 10-14, 2008, Miami, Florida
-----
When replying, please *trim your post* as much as possible.
*Plain text, please; NO Attachments
Searchable Archive at http://www.info-arch.org/lists/sigia-l/
________________________________________
Sigia-l mailing list -- post to: Sigia-l_at_asis.org
Changes to subscription: http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigia-l
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6
: Wed Jun 20 2007 - 23:11:39 EDT
|
